The construction industry lost 3,000 jobs between July and August as ongoing declines in nonresidential segments offset a pickup among residential building and remodeling firms, according to a recently released analysis by the Associated General Contractors of America of government data. Association officials said their newly released survey shows many contractors are eager to hire but are encountering a lack of qualified applicants and supply-chain delays that are holding back nonresidential employment gains.
“Today’s figures show that nonresidential building and infrastructure contractors are having a hard time recovering from the impact of the pandemic on demand for structures,” said Ken Simonson, the association’s chief economist. “At the same time, our survey finds many contractors have job openings but are experiencing a lack of qualified applicants, shortages of materials and long delivery delays.”
Construction employment in August totaled 7,416,000, a drop of 3,000 from July. Employment among nonresidential firms – comprising heavy and civil engineering construction firms, along with nonresidential building and specialty trade contractors – shrank for the fifth month in a row, by 20,300. In contrast, homebuilders and residential specialty trade contractors added 17,400 workers, the fourth-straight gain.
Despite the job losses for nonresidential construction firms, the association’s annual workforce survey, conducted with Autodesk, found many of its members – nonresidential and multifamily contractors – have unfilled job openings. Ninety percent of the more than 2,100 firms that responded had openings for hourly craft workers, while 62 percent had openings for salaried employees. Overwhelming percentages of firms with openings reported having a hard time filling positions, including 89 percent of the companies seeking craft workers and 86 percent of those looking for salaried employees.
Contractors are facing multiple challenges. Seventy-two percent of survey respondents reported that available job candidates were not qualified. Three-quarters of the firms reported projects were delayed due to longer lead times or shortages of materials, while 57 percent reported delivery delays.